Publication Type:

Journal Article

Source:

Exploration Geophysics (Melbourne), Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Alderley, Queensl., Australia, Volume 44, Number 4, p.238-244 (2013)

ISBN:

0812-3985

Keywords:

anomalies, Canada, case studies, data processing, electrical conductivity, electromagnetic methods, equations, geophysical methods, geophysical surveys, magnetic field, massive deposits, massive sulfide deposits, mathematical models, Metamorphic rocks, metasedimentary rocks, overburden, size, sulfides, surveys, transient methods

Abstract:

A discrete conductive sphere model in which current paths are constrained to a single planar orientation (the 'dipping sphere') is used to calculate the secondary response from Geotech Ltd's VTEM airborne time domain electromagnetic (EM) system. In addition to calculating the time constants of the B-field and dB/dt responses, we focus on the time-constant ratio at a late time interval and compare numerical results with several field examples. For very strong conductors with conductivity above a critical value, both the B-field and dB/dt responses show decreasing values as the conductivity increases. Therefore response does not uniquely define conductivity. However, calculation of time constants for the decay removes the ambiguity and allows discrimination of high and low conductivity targets. A further benefit is gained by comparing the time constants of the B-field and dB/dt decays, which co-vary systematically over a wide range of target conductance. An advantage of calculating time constant ratios is that the ratios are insensitive to the dip and the depth of the targets and are stable across the conductor. Therefore we propose to use their ratio r (sub tau ) = T (sub B) /T (sub dB/dt) as a tool to estimate the size and conductivity of mineral deposits. Using the VTEM base frequency, the magnitude of r (sub tau ) reaches a limiting value of 1.32 for the most highly conductive targets. Interpretations become more complicated in the presence of conductive overburden, which appears to cause the limiting value of r (sub tau ) to increase to 2 or more.

Notes:

GeoRef, Copyright 2018, American Geological Institute.<br/>2014-067978<br/>B-field<br/>Eagle's Nest Deposit<br/>VTEM